“Unknowing” as Opportunity Potential
As people, perhaps we react with fear when we identify the experience of another as so “radically” different from our own experiences because it ultimately makes us look inward and forces us to question the validity and relevance of our own ways of existing in the world. That can be a scary existential threat if we assume that some ways are completely ‘good’–and others, completely ‘bad’.
If you’re doing things the “right” way, then the other way must be “wrong”. Right?
Instead of trying to come to conclusions about the existential questions that seemingly anomalous events may elicit, maybe letting go of the need to come to conclusions at all–and just accepting “closure” and “certainty” as illusory concepts in the first place–could help us connect to others, ourselves, and the wonderfully unpredictable world around us.
Because, nobody knows (probably), but if we can unconditionally accept our shared potential as human beings: a potential to deliver good ideas, bad ideas, and everything in between, maybe we can co-recover those integral connections that make our ‘being’ relevant. And that is a type of sense making that is priceless.
In looking at some gaping knowledge voids—the uncertainty introduced by reliability and validity issues, the epistemological and ontological mysteries of consciousness and being, the ways in which we think we fully understand the essence or nature of any ‘thing’ or ‘construct’, to name a few— we see that it quickly gets difficult to lay claim to ‘what is’. This limitations of our existing knowledge is especially relevant when thinking about professional ethics in a social system where we see certain agents of knowledge (for example, doctors) laying claim to “that which is true” about other people and themselves (for example, practitioners control assessment and evaluation in psychiatry, clinical psychology, or any “health” profession). Given the ethical implications that defining others&ourselves has for our intellectual, social, physical decision making powers and capacities for change (constraining effect)–it seems important to reflect upon how we may be able to integrate—from the social to the post meta-physical—a theoretical framework of uncertainty that makes salient the ever-present transience of what we think we know or believe. See Also Acatalepsy and Intellectual Humility
To the site owner:
Action required! Mendeley is changing its API. In order to keep using Mendeley with BibBase past April 14th, you need to:
- renew the authorization for BibBase on Mendeley, and
- update the BibBase URL in your page the same way you did when you initially set up this page.